Paste a paper. Get a personalized reading path that traces every prerequisite — from the papers it builds on, down to the math concepts behind them. Check off what you know; the path recalculates.
First 100 signups get 3 months of Pro free.
Not because you can't learn it — but because nobody tells you what to learn first. Google Scholar gives you 40 related papers. ChatGPT gives you a summary. Neither gives you a path.
DOI, arXiv link, or title. We resolve it against the full scholarly citation graph (250M+ works).
Prerequisite papers and textbook concepts — KL divergence, Sobolev spaces, subgradients — ordered so each step builds on the last.
The path recalculates from your knowledge frontier. You never re-read what you've already mastered.
Paper ordering: actual output from our OpenAlex-based prototype (abridged). Concept steps: from our prerequisite graph for math & statistics (expert-calibrated, refined by feedback).
Citation-graph tools (Connected Papers, Litmaps) show you maps — beautiful, and useless for deciding what to read first. Prereq gives you a route: built on the full open citation graph, plus a prerequisite graph for math and statistics where every edge carries a verification status — expert-checked, community-confirmed, or draft — instead of being scraped and trusted blindly.
No. We don't summarize papers — we sequence them. Prereq tells you the order in which to read things, given what you already know.
Papers from ML/AI, statistics, mathematics, and physics work best today. The concept layer covers mathematics and statistics first; more domains follow.
The open OpenAlex citation graph (250M+ scholarly works), plus our own prerequisite graph for math & statistics. Edges are drafted with LLMs, calibrated against hand-verified reference topics, and labeled with their verification status — user feedback promotes or removes edges over time.
First 100 signups get 3 months of Pro free.
We're finishing the engine. Join the waitlist and the first 100 signups get 3 months of Pro free at launch.